posted 10-01-2010 09:01 AM         

---

Arizona case that deserves to be looked at by those doing PCSOT examinations.

http://www.cofad1.state.az.us/opinionfiles/SA/SA100098.pdf

IP: Logged

posted 10-02-2010 12:23 PM            

---

What kind of effect, if any, has this ruling had on those conducting PCSOT exams in Arizona? Have there been any major changes as a result?

IP: Logged

posted 10-03-2010 02:19 PM         

---

I don't do PCSOT in Arizona, just thought I would share and get comments from those conducting tests in Arizona.

I would think examiners would ask for additional victims, tell the offender to not give any identifiers that would allow probation to find the victims and provide necessary information for treatment rather than for prosecution. It is treatment.

IP: Logged

posted 10-04-2010 09:41 AM         

---

The defense challenged A.R.S 13-4066, which provides privileged communication in sex offender treatment. The statute can be viewed here: http://www.azleg.state.az.us/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/ars/13/04066.htm&Title=13&D ocType=ARS

There have been no significant modifications to procedures since the ruling, which was made at the end of August 2010.

[This message has been edited by cpolys (edited 10-04-2010).]

IP: Logged